Tracks on tractors
-
Eugen
- Posts: 5379
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:52 pm
- Location: Port Mcnicoll, Ontario
- Has thanked: 14077 times
- Been thanked: 17441 times
- Contact:
-
JSinMO
- Posts: 2024
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2022 8:16 pm
- Location: Missouri
- Has thanked: 15778 times
- Been thanked: 9031 times
Re: Working the 644lbh
I’ve had that same thought. I know they had a track and idler setup for the bigger Ford tractors back in the day. That would be a heck of a project on a 600 series!
-
Toolslinger
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:03 pm
- Location: NJ/PA
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 2321 times
Re: Working the 644lbh
I think I'd be looking for one of the little Davis trenchers that rode on tracks before I dove into the nightmare that putting tracks on a 6xx would be.
Or you could just find a slightly larger Kubota with loader, and hoe, and get on with life... (heresy, I know...
)
Or you could just find a slightly larger Kubota with loader, and hoe, and get on with life... (heresy, I know...
-
thebuildist
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 5:09 pm
- Location: Atlanta, ga
- Has thanked: 895 times
- Been thanked: 3541 times
Re: Working the 644lbh
The problem with with tracks on any Case/Ingersoll is steering. With a big rectangular profile where the tracks are resting on the ground, any turning of the tractor means one of the tracks has to be dragged sideways. The open differential will allow one track to rotate faster than the other, but the innermost track itself has to be dragged sideways in the dirt, and there's a lot of resistance to that, and it will damage any delicate turf.
It makes the front wheels' job all the more difficult to do, especially if they're in soft stuff, or if they're at all resting lightly on the ground.
The thought has occurred to me that you could actually replace the rear transaxle with a pair of hydraulic motor wheels like something off of a skidsteer. But that's a pretty major project/modification, and at that point you'd might as well just convert it into a fully tracked vehicle.
Another thought I had was to build removable tracks in conjunction with the three point hitch. It could be a combination counterbalance and rear tracks. My thought was that you'd adjust the orientation of the tracks via large turnbuckles, (something as large as a 3 pt. top link) and tension/de-tension the tracks by lifting or dropping the 3pt arms. That would make removing the tracks very fast and easy. It would look something like this:
But because of the turning/steering challenges, you'd have to configure it such that the majority of the time the rear bogey/idler wheels are elevated off the ground like this:
For that to work, you'd want the angle/orientation of the tracks to be controlled by moving the 3-pt arms. You could operate most of the time with the rear bogeys elevated, which would minimize steering difficulty and turf damage, and use the 3-pt to lower the rear bogeys whenever you need extra traction. But that does mean you'd have to remove/install the tracks via slow/clunky turnbuckles. But it does seem like it could actually work, though it would be a big, ambitious project.
I can't imagine any way you could do any of this with an LBH.
Bob
It makes the front wheels' job all the more difficult to do, especially if they're in soft stuff, or if they're at all resting lightly on the ground.
The thought has occurred to me that you could actually replace the rear transaxle with a pair of hydraulic motor wheels like something off of a skidsteer. But that's a pretty major project/modification, and at that point you'd might as well just convert it into a fully tracked vehicle.
Another thought I had was to build removable tracks in conjunction with the three point hitch. It could be a combination counterbalance and rear tracks. My thought was that you'd adjust the orientation of the tracks via large turnbuckles, (something as large as a 3 pt. top link) and tension/de-tension the tracks by lifting or dropping the 3pt arms. That would make removing the tracks very fast and easy. It would look something like this:
But because of the turning/steering challenges, you'd have to configure it such that the majority of the time the rear bogey/idler wheels are elevated off the ground like this:
For that to work, you'd want the angle/orientation of the tracks to be controlled by moving the 3-pt arms. You could operate most of the time with the rear bogeys elevated, which would minimize steering difficulty and turf damage, and use the 3-pt to lower the rear bogeys whenever you need extra traction. But that does mean you'd have to remove/install the tracks via slow/clunky turnbuckles. But it does seem like it could actually work, though it would be a big, ambitious project.
I can't imagine any way you could do any of this with an LBH.
Bob
"Never be afraid to try something new. How hard can it be?"
-
Eugen
- Posts: 5379
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:52 pm
- Location: Port Mcnicoll, Ontario
- Has thanked: 14077 times
- Been thanked: 17441 times
- Contact:
Re: Working the 644lbh
This is how Ford did it on the 8N. Don't know how well steering worked but most likely it wasn't too bad.
I don't mean to hijack @Harry 's thread, maybe we open a thread on tracks on our tractors ideas.
I don't mean to hijack @Harry 's thread, maybe we open a thread on tracks on our tractors ideas.
-
Timj
- Posts: 1457
- Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:57 pm
- Location: Central WI
- Has thanked: 5376 times
- Been thanked: 5113 times
Re: Working the 644lbh
I asked my dad yesterday, he ran one that the snowmobile club had, he said you had to use the brakes to help get it to turn.
no more mow it's time to blow 
-
propane1
- Posts: 2855
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:32 am
- Location: PEI, Canada
- Has thanked: 6799 times
- Been thanked: 10918 times
Re: Working the 644lbh
That’s for sure Tim. Brakes had to be used. And with the narrow front tires and sharp turning, they worked fairly well.
Noel