Case D100 backhoe
- thebuildist
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 5:09 pm
- Location: Atlanta, ga
- Has thanked: 849 times
- Been thanked: 3290 times
Case D100 backhoe
So I have a possible line on a Case D100 backhoe attachment from a Case trencher. It's what I consider to be very inexpensive. Cheaper than I'd pay to buy steel and cylinders.
It does have some kind of control levers, but it doesn't have any kind of outriggers or a place to attach a seat.
Obviously I'd need to fabricate some kind of mount with a subframe, etc, and rework this hoe's attachment frame to match. I'd try to work out some kind of a removable deal, where the whole underslung subframe can be easily removed. And I'm already piped to send it hyrdraulic flow.
So I feel confident enough about that part of it. But: Are my (non-gusseted) axle tubes strong enough to haul the dead weight around? If I need to reinforce them myself, how confident are we that they're cast steel, not cast iron?
And I guess I'd need to fabricate some outriggers and work them into the mounting area.
Anything else I need to think about before I take the plunge?
Bob
It does have some kind of control levers, but it doesn't have any kind of outriggers or a place to attach a seat.
Obviously I'd need to fabricate some kind of mount with a subframe, etc, and rework this hoe's attachment frame to match. I'd try to work out some kind of a removable deal, where the whole underslung subframe can be easily removed. And I'm already piped to send it hyrdraulic flow.
So I feel confident enough about that part of it. But: Are my (non-gusseted) axle tubes strong enough to haul the dead weight around? If I need to reinforce them myself, how confident are we that they're cast steel, not cast iron?
And I guess I'd need to fabricate some outriggers and work them into the mounting area.
Anything else I need to think about before I take the plunge?
Bob
"Never be afraid to try something new. How hard can it be?"
- MattA
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:57 pm
- Location: Swansea MA
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 3786 times
Re: Case D100 backhoe
Bob this is what the transaxle in my 2001 4016 looks like. It's also got slightly different gearing. If you need more pictures or measurements let me know.
Ingersoll 4016
- thebuildist
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 5:09 pm
- Location: Atlanta, ga
- Has thanked: 849 times
- Been thanked: 3290 times
Re: Case D100 backhoe
Are you just TRYING to make me jealous?
"Never be afraid to try something new. How hard can it be?"
- Eugen
- Posts: 5171
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:52 pm
- Location: Port Mcnicoll, Ontario
- Has thanked: 12125 times
- Been thanked: 16383 times
- Contact:
Re: Case D100 backhoe
The down riggers should be part of the frame on which the backhoe is connected. Look carefully. Did you see the pics from my trencher that has the D100?
Case 224, 444, 644, 680E
Kubota B26
Kubota B26
-
- Posts: 1598
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2022 8:16 pm
- Location: Missouri
- Has thanked: 12234 times
- Been thanked: 6996 times
Re: Case D100 backhoe
@thebuildist I can’t help you with the axel questions, but some other things came to mind.
My 648 has the D100 backhoe with vertical stabilizers like this.
They do work, but I think an outrigger style would be more stable and maybe better at preventing tipping when swinging the boom. I’m really aware when I’m moving the boom side to side to make sure I’m not getting in trouble.
The other thing I thought of is weight. Here is the difference between the D100 with vertical stabilizers and outriggers.
My backhoe weighs in at 810LBS without the bucket, not sure what it weighs. The subframe on my tractor has a 500LBS counter weight built into the front of it under the front of the tractor. The front end of the tractor is still very light. It takes very little to get the front wheels off the ground when traveling.
1) A subframe with counter balance may be difficult to make quick disconnect.
2) I’m not sure of the differences between my 648 and your tractor, but since I know my front end is still too light, would a quick disconnect subframe with no counter weight, and a bucket mounted counter weight be better? That would get the weight farther out in front of the tractor and hopefully balance it better.
Just some things I thought of. @Eugen added the backhoe manual to the technical library here some time back. It should have a lot on info in it for you.
My 648 has the D100 backhoe with vertical stabilizers like this.
They do work, but I think an outrigger style would be more stable and maybe better at preventing tipping when swinging the boom. I’m really aware when I’m moving the boom side to side to make sure I’m not getting in trouble.
The other thing I thought of is weight. Here is the difference between the D100 with vertical stabilizers and outriggers.
My backhoe weighs in at 810LBS without the bucket, not sure what it weighs. The subframe on my tractor has a 500LBS counter weight built into the front of it under the front of the tractor. The front end of the tractor is still very light. It takes very little to get the front wheels off the ground when traveling.
1) A subframe with counter balance may be difficult to make quick disconnect.
2) I’m not sure of the differences between my 648 and your tractor, but since I know my front end is still too light, would a quick disconnect subframe with no counter weight, and a bucket mounted counter weight be better? That would get the weight farther out in front of the tractor and hopefully balance it better.
Just some things I thought of. @Eugen added the backhoe manual to the technical library here some time back. It should have a lot on info in it for you.
- thebuildist
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 5:09 pm
- Location: Atlanta, ga
- Has thanked: 849 times
- Been thanked: 3290 times
Re: Case D100 backhoe
Here's what I know about it until Monday:
As far as I can tell, that seems to be one of these:
https://www.bigiron.com/Lots/DavisCaseI ... Attachment
which has a big, beefy attachment frame, but no downriggers that I can perceive. So I presume I'll have to fab a set.
Thoughts on the need for reinforcing axle tubes, and how easy or difficult it'll be? If it's steel, I can weld in some gussets from 1/2" plate steel. If it's cast iron, I'll have to braze them in, which is a way more involved process.
As far as I can tell, that seems to be one of these:
https://www.bigiron.com/Lots/DavisCaseI ... Attachment
which has a big, beefy attachment frame, but no downriggers that I can perceive. So I presume I'll have to fab a set.
Thoughts on the need for reinforcing axle tubes, and how easy or difficult it'll be? If it's steel, I can weld in some gussets from 1/2" plate steel. If it's cast iron, I'll have to braze them in, which is a way more involved process.
"Never be afraid to try something new. How hard can it be?"
- Harry
- Posts: 1529
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2021 8:33 am
- Location: Lockport,NY
- Has thanked: 9500 times
- Been thanked: 6447 times
Re: Case D100 backhoe
Bob, sounds like a huge project to me, but I figure your the guy who can get it done from what I’ve seen from projects you have completed. I’ve always found myself that I have been tempted in buying something that is a big project for me. For myself I’m better off waiting until something more feasible comes along. I just have to play the waiting game until it does. Just my two cents. Harry
1973 444, 1974 644, 1976 446, 1977 646, 1986 226
- Spike188
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 12:58 pm
- Location: Ayr Ontario
- Has thanked: 5931 times
- Been thanked: 4173 times
Re: Case D100 backhoe
Bob, Around here the D100's in working condition asking price is $4000CD. I agree with Harry that this is a big project. From the pictures on your link it appears that the down riggers are not in the tubes. This makes me wonder if the down rigger cylinders and related piping is also missing. As far as under carriage and counter weights go, they can be fabricated with flatbar and slab plate.
The BH tractors came with webbed rear axles for added strength to carry the added weight of backhoe. There would be considerable stress on the axles when the hoe bucket was full of dirt while moving the tractor with its light front end.
The BH tractors came with webbed rear axles for added strength to carry the added weight of backhoe. There would be considerable stress on the axles when the hoe bucket was full of dirt while moving the tractor with its light front end.
Spike Colt - 9 & 10, Case - 108, 118, 444, 446, 448, 646, 646bh, Ingersoll 4016, 4118AH
-
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:09 pm
- Location: Houghton Lake, MI
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 1438 times
Re: Case D100 backhoe
Honestly I wouldn't put that heavy backhoe on your tractor. I know you've beefed up the frame and what-not. But a 4000 series with a d100 will drag your machine around and bounce the front end off the ground. You would have to make and extremely sturdy sub frame. I think if you do decide to buy it you should re sell it and buy something lighter and a hair smaller.
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
- DavidBarkey
- Posts: 3162
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:35 am
- Location: Waverley On.
- Has thanked: 17388 times
- Been thanked: 10720 times
Re: Case D100 backhoe
@thebuildist Bob all the welding to web the rear axle would put a lot of internal stresses on the axle and possibly pull it out of align so as it would need line boring on the tubes . As for the D100 , why not make it tow able but still use your machine to anchor the front and power the hydraulics . Once in position outriggers would fold down and lift it off the wheels . or self propelled like this . food for thought
Dave
Mad Tractor Builder
Mad Tractor Builder