Diesel vs gasoline

Everything about Kohler, Onan, B&S, Honda, and other engines.
User avatar
Eugen Canada
Posts: 5141
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:52 pm
Location: Port Mcnicoll, Ontario
Has thanked: 11934 times
Been thanked: 16195 times
Contact:

Diesel vs gasoline

Post by Eugen »

Moved this discussion here from Pictures...

Consider this guys, so everybody and their brother want a diesel engine. Let's take this little G5200 as an example. We can expect a little more torque from the diesel engine, as compared to the Kohler K321, but how much? And you have a three cylinder engine, which at some point you will have to rebuild. Somehow I think the one cylinder Kohler is easier to rebuild and cheaper, please correct me if I'm wrong. On the other hand, maybe you save money on fuel with this diesel engine? I have doubts about that too. The other thing is, the availability and price of attachments for the Case is much better around here. For me Case wins big time.
Last edited by Eugen on Wed Mar 08, 2023 9:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Case 224, 444, 644, 680E
Kubota B26 :blush:
User avatar
Gordy United States of America
Posts: 653
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2021 1:24 pm
Location: MapleLake,MN
Has thanked: 2343 times
Been thanked: 2136 times

Re: Pictures: this moment

Post by Gordy »

Eugen wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 10:14 am @FUTZ I am drooling looking at that bbq! That Kubota G5200 has the 14hp 3cyl diesel engine. In all honesty though, I would not trade my 444 for it, even not knowing what @Spike188 just said, but more so now.

Consider this guys, so everybody and their brother want a diesel engine. Let's take this little G5200 as an example. We can expect a little more torque from the diesel engine, as compared to the Kohler K321, but how much? And you have a three cylinder engine, which at some point you will have to rebuild. Somehow I think the one cylinder Kohler is easier to rebuild and cheaper, please correct me if I'm wrong. On the other hand, maybe you save money on fuel with this diesel engine? I have doubts about that too. The other thing is, the availability and price of attachments for the Case is much better around here. For me Case wins big time.
On the other site someone did a diesel swap. I recall him saying what would have taken a full tank of fuel with the Onan, took 1/3 of a tank with the diesel.

:cheers:
Gordy
User avatar
Eugen Canada
Posts: 5141
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:52 pm
Location: Port Mcnicoll, Ontario
Has thanked: 11934 times
Been thanked: 16195 times
Contact:

Re: Pictures: this moment

Post by Eugen »

Gordy wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 11:17 am

On the other site someone did a diesel swap. I recall him saying what would have taken a full tank of fuel with the Onan, took 1/3 of a tank with the diesel.

:cheers:
Gordy
Same HP and similar torque? Come on, free energy? :D

I can believe some difference, but it's hard to believe the Onan is three times as bad in efficiency, producing the same amount of power.
Case 224, 444, 644, 680E
Kubota B26 :blush:
User avatar
Toolslinger United States of America
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:03 pm
Location: NJ/PA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 1435 times

Re: Pictures: this moment

Post by Toolslinger »

Well, the diesel has 15% more energy per gallon to start with. After that, the diesel engine is likely more thermally effecient... I'm not sure you're going to cut fuel use in a third, but you could for sure do better than the gas engine.
User avatar
propane1 Canada
Posts: 2427
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:32 am
Location: PEI, Canada
Has thanked: 5740 times
Been thanked: 8671 times

Re: Pictures: this moment

Post by propane1 »

Kohler K341 16 hp at 3600 rpm, 28.25 ftlb of torque at 2600 rpm.
Shibarua engine, 16 hp at 2700 rpm, 36 ftlb of torque at 1800 rpm

Noel.
Attachments
CB6EB466-9499-41CF-B2E5-4D5C9A49C2CF.jpeg
C50B52AC-C2B3-4491-8DE1-EC0281BF6935.jpeg
User avatar
Toolslinger United States of America
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:03 pm
Location: NJ/PA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 1435 times

Re: Pictures: this moment

Post by Toolslinger »

Putting a different pump in to take advantage of the extra torque would help too. Possibly a lot if the machine wasn't really working out at the ragged edge of performance to start with.
User avatar
propane1 Canada
Posts: 2427
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:32 am
Location: PEI, Canada
Has thanked: 5740 times
Been thanked: 8671 times

Re: Pictures: this moment

Post by propane1 »

So on PEI. Diesel is at the moment 39 cents more pre litre than gasoline. I’m guessing in some situations it would cost more to run diesel. Maybe.
Quite a difference in compression ratios in a diesel compared to a gasoline engine. Maybe that’s where the diesel gets it’s power in torque. :106:


Noel
User avatar
Eugen Canada
Posts: 5141
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:52 pm
Location: Port Mcnicoll, Ontario
Has thanked: 11934 times
Been thanked: 16195 times
Contact:

Re: Pictures: this moment

Post by Eugen »

It seemed incredible to me, but it's very close to what the theory says. On average a gasoline engine is apparently 20% efficient. That means that with 10 gallons of gasoline you can mow an area of let's say 5 acres. Diesel apparently figures at 40% efficiency, which means that 10 gallons are used to mow twice that area, 10 acres. In other words, if you use one tank of gas with an Onan engine to mow an area, you can expect to use 1/2 the tank with a diesel engine. 1/2 is not one third, but well, we can brush that 16.6% under mathematical error. :geek:

OK, fine! I have a Z400 diesel engine (10HP) that I'm thinking of deploying for mower duty. :giggle:
Case 224, 444, 644, 680E
Kubota B26 :blush:
User avatar
Toolslinger United States of America
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 12:03 pm
Location: NJ/PA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 1435 times

Re: Pictures: this moment

Post by Toolslinger »

Actually that 16% lines up nicely with the additional power density of the diesel fuel.
User avatar
Eugen Canada
Posts: 5141
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:52 pm
Location: Port Mcnicoll, Ontario
Has thanked: 11934 times
Been thanked: 16195 times
Contact:

Re: Pictures: this moment

Post by Eugen »

Toolslinger wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:11 pm Actually that 16% lines up nicely with the additional power density of the diesel fuel.
I believe that is taken into account, as 40% is total efficiency (fuel and combustion). I made the numbers look actually better for diesel. The wikipedia article on this says
Diesel engines generally achieve greater fuel efficiency than petrol (gasoline) engines. Passenger car diesel engines have energy efficiency of up to 41% but more typically 30%, and petrol engines of up to 37.3%, but more typically 20%. A common margin is 25% more miles per gallon for an efficient turbodiesel.
So, typical would be 30% for diesel and 20% for gasoline.
Case 224, 444, 644, 680E
Kubota B26 :blush:
Post Reply